Dacă google e barometrul interesului pe Internet, atunci Adolf Hitler (1889-1945) are o cotă de 40 de milioane.
Care ar fi fost soarta Germaniei, dacă ar fi murit în 1939? Pentru că ce a realizat el după 1933 a depăşit cu mult ceea ce a obţinut pe plan extern Bismarck.
Pe plan intern, el lichidează şomajul şi face ziua de 1 mai sărbătoare. Economia, cultura, ştiinţa şi tehnica se înviorează după ce el reface demnitatea naţională călcată în picioare la Pacea de la Versailles 1919.
Austriac, de origine modestă, tatăl vameş, Hitler cade la examenul de admitere la Arte Plastice. Dar la Viena îşi formează, marginalizat fiind, un program revoluţionar contra marxiştilor, evreilor şi burgheziei. Pleacă la München, este voluntar în armata germană, victimă a gazelor de luptă, obţine Crucea de Fier II.
După război transformă Partidul Muncitoresc German într-o „Mişcare” naţional-socialistă a muncitorilor germani. Combate democraţia. Puciul său eşuiază şi ajunge în puşcărie unde dictează Mein Kampf, o ofertă politică de o surprinzătoare sinceritate.
Eliberat înainte de termen ajunge la putere totuşi pe cale democratică cu ajutorul burgheziei, care-l folosea împotriva comuniştilor. Consecvent, cei de stânga, marxiştii, evreii sunt persecutaţi şi internaţi în lagăre.
Burghezia, nobilimea devine naţional-socialistă, asfel că Hitler era ori slab, ori corupt de cei de dreapta. Exterminarea „paraziţilor” îi privea initial numai pe handicapaţii „arieni”.
1/3 din evreii emigrează. Holocaustul nu poartă direct semnătura lui Hitler. Elita naţional-socialistă era antisemită, nu mai avea nevoie de aşa ceva. Oricum Lagăre de exterminare n-au existat în Germania, ci numai în est.
În războiul cu „iudeo-bolşevicii” ruşi poziţia anglo-mozaica era hotărâtoare. Premiza că „verişorii” anglo-saxoni vor fi de partea „arienilor” germani şi nu de partea slavilor „inferiori” a fost falsă.
Stalin se aliază şi „cu rasa superioară” şi cu anglo-americanii anti-comunişti şi ocupă astfel jumătate din Europa.
În Berlinul înconjurat de Armata Roşie, Hitler face un bilanţ în faţa fruntaşilor Mişcării sale. Pe cei de stânga, marxişti, evreii i-a lichidat, dar pe burghezi, pe nobili i-a uitat, un păcat de neiertat: cei de dreapta, erau oameni de ieri, fără elan revoluţionar sau chiar trădători. Stalin nu s-a lăsat orbit de aparenţe şi a învins.
La sfârşitul vieţii Hitler îşi exprimă regretul că în România s-a bazat pe regele depăşit de vreme, pe anturajul sau corupt şi reacţionar, care l-au arestat pe conducătorul armatei şi predat la comunişti (!), în loc să promoveze forţele revoluţionare tinere.
E o ironie a istoriei că în România, reacţionarii şi corupţii, cei de dreapta, liberalii, conservatorii, ex-regele, trădătorii de ieri, sunt şi astăzi la putere sau reîmproprietăriţi, în timp ce 90% din tineret vor să părăsească ţara.
Succesele lui Hitler s-au pulverizat în război: 50 de milioane de morţi; germanii la pământ. La întrebarea ce-ar fi fost dacă Hitler murea în 1939, nu există un răspuns.
În ceea ce priveşte România, după 1989, s-a revenit la cutumele balcanice, care l-au corupt şi pe Hitler.
Prof. dr. Viorel Roman, consilier academic la Universitatea din Bremen, Germania
Googleberg:
usa is evil – About 95,700,000 results
russia is evil – About 41,300,000 results
the pope is evil – About 44,300,000 results
obama is evil – About 53,200,000 results
hitler was evil – About 22,500,000 results
communism is evil – About 11,000,000 results
capitalism is evil – About 19,700,000 results
E clar ?
Continuare…..
” If, in accordance with their plan, the Russians had been able to foresee our actions, it is, probable that nothing would have been able to stop their armoured units, for the highly developed road system of central Europe would greatly have favoured their advance. In any case, I take credit for the fact that we succeeded in making the Russians hold off right up to the moment when we launched our attack, and that we did so by entering into agreements which were favourable to their interests.” Suppose for example that, when the Russians marched into Rumania, we had not been able to limit their conquests to Bessarabia, they would in one swoop have grabbed all the oilfields of the country, and we should have found ourselves, from the spring of that very year, completely frustrated as regards our supplies of petrol.” Pagina 490
” Kallay, the new Prime Minister of Hungary, came to me with two „little requests” from Regent Horthy—namely, that firstly the Lord God and secondly I myself should turn a benevolent blind eye if the Hungarians started a fight with the Rumanians. From the Hungarian point of view, said Kallay, such a fight would be a struggle against Asia, for the frontier between Europe and Asia was, in Hungarian eyes, the line where the Orthodox Church ceased to hold sway. It was, after all, he said, only the countries on this side of that frontier which had played their part in European cultural development and all its great accomplishments, such as the Reformation, the Renaissance and the like. It was for this reason that Hungary had always been hostile to Russia and had at the time been at a loss to understand the policy of the Third Reich when it made its pact with Russia. Kallay went on to point out that the river Theis held the same significance for the Hungarians as did the Rhine for Germans. The Rhine, in German eyes, was a German river; in the same way the Tisza to Hungarians was not an international frontier but a national waterway. ” Pagina 516
” If the Hungarians go to war with the Rumanians, then, unless I am much mistaken, Antonescu will knock hell out of them ! The day will come when the Viennese idea will be proved to be right. In the ten thousand cafés of Vienna, this is how the Hungarian problem is envisaged: „Hungary belongs to us, and the people in Berlin know nothing about it. It was we who liberated the Hungarians from the Turks, and order will not be restored in Hungary until we liberate the country again. So why on earth don’t we take it over and have done with it! And the Slovenes? It is no doubt fine that they should be independent; but after all they, too, belong to us!” Pagina 622
” There were some curious characters among the diplomats accredited to Berlin. The Dutchman, who had a young and beautiful wife, was concerned chiefly with fussing and watching over his ewe-lamb, and he was in a fever if any man spoke to her! The Rumanian, on the other hand, was, to say the least
of it, most open-minded in this respect! He seemed to adopt the attitude that one little peccadillo more or less doesn’t make much odds. His lady slept sixteen hours a day and retained an astonishingly youthful appearance. One day she introduced me to a middle-aged lady—her daughter! Then there was a Royal Highness, a Princess from Iran; she was a real baggage! She was taking lessons in painting and had a new master every week! ” Pagina 630
” How the Rumanians and the Hungarians hate each other! Horthy has some astonishing ideas ! Like all Hungarians, he hates the Habsburgs. Taking a wholly dispassionate view, I think it is a great pity that Horthy’s son has been killed. The internal stability of the country would have been much more strongly
assured had he survived. The old man himself is animated by a fanatical desire to conserve his own health. He’s a bull of a man, and was, without doubt, the bravest man in the Austrian Navy. The Hungarian aristocracy has predominantly German blood in its veins; all the original aristocracies of Europe belong, fundamentally, to one single international community. I should not be surprised to see Horthy try, thanks to his hatred of the Habsburgs, to re-establish contact with Vienna. ” Pagina 667
” Of all our allies, it is Antonescu who has the greatest breadth of vision. He is a man of real personality, and he has, moreover, realised that this war gives Rumania the chance to become predominant in the Balkans, but at the expense of finding the other Balkan States in alliance against her.” Pagina 694
Cartea poate fi descarcata aici :
http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=EC917E07236CA5B760A706AB0A03F681
Daca vorbim despre Adolf Hitler, sa-l lasam si pe Adolf Hitler sa vorbeasca despre noi…… Extrase din cartea Hitlers Table Talk
” Friday, 25th July 1941, midday
Rumania must become an agricultural country. Rumania would do well to give up, as far as possible, the idea of having her own industry. She would direct the wealth of her soil, and especially her wheat, towards the German market. She would receive from us, in exchange, the manufactured goods she needs. Bessarabia is a real granary. Thus the Rumanian proletariat, which is contaminated by Bolshevism, would disappear, and the country would never lack anything. I must own that King Carol has worked in that direction. ”
Pagina 14
”A few weeks ago Antonescu, in a communiqué, accused one of his units of being a disgrace to the nation. Antonescu is of Germanic origin, not Rumanian; he’s a born soldier. His misfortune is to have Rumanians under his command. But let’s not forget that only a year ago these people were wildly fleeing from the Bolsheviks. It’s wonderful how, in so short a time, Antonescu has been able to get what he has got out of his troops. Doubtless he will also succeed, with time, in obtaining administrators who aren’t rotten with corruption. Our own people hasn’t always been as impeccable as it is nowadays. Remember the sabre-blows that Frederick William I used to administer to the Berliners with his own hand. Moral cleanliness is the result of a long education, ceaselessly directed towards discipline. ”
Pagina 49
”With the fall of Odessa, the war will be practically over for Rumania. All that’s left for the Rumanians to do is to consolidate their position. In the face of Antonescu’s success, the opposition will collapse. Peoples always give themselves to victorious commanders. Reactionaries are like hollow nuts. They take a whisper uttered by one booby and transmitted to other boobies, they make a real rumour, and they end by persuading themselves that here is the true, thundering voice of the people. In actual fact, what they hear is only the amplified echo of their own feeble voices. That’s how, in some quarters, the people is credited with feelings that are utterly foreign to it. Antonescu has the merit of having intervened in favour of Codreanu. Apart from the Duce, amongst our allies Antonescu is the man who makes the strongest impression. He’s a man on a big scale, who never lets anything throw him out of his stride, and he’s incorruptible, what’s more—a man such as Rumania has never had before. I may say that there was nothing in Rumania, including the officers, that couldn’t be bought. I’m not even alluding to the venality of the women, who are always ready to prostitute themselves to gain promotion for a husband or father. It’s true that the pay of all these servants of the State was ridiculously stingy. Antonescu now has the job of building up his State by basing it on agriculture. For industry, he’d need abilities that his peasant class (which is sober and honest) does not possess. On the other hand, a usable administration can be recruited amongst this class. But it must be small, and it must be adequately paid. Whoever in Rumania continues to abandon himself to corruption will have to be shot. There must be no shrinking from the death penalty when it’s a question of strangling an epidemic. The present type of official, when faced with such a threat, will prefer to give up his post—which can then be offered to somebody respectable. It goes without saying that the officers must be paid so that they will no longer be obliged to find subsidiary occupations in order to keep alive. To bring decency into civil life, the first condition is to have an integral State: an incorruptible army, a police and
administration reduced to a minimum. But the first thing, above all, is to get rid of the Jew. Without that, it will be useless to clean the Augean stables.If Antonescu sets about the job in this manner, he’ll be the head of a thriving country, inwardly healthy and strong. For this purpose he has a good peasantry (Hungary has nothing like it) and natural riches. Moreover,”Rumania is a country with a thinly scattered population. ” Pagina 66
”By the law of nature, the most important person of a nation should be the best man. If I take the example of Rumania, the best man is Antonescu. What are we to say of a State where a man like him is only the second, whilst at the head is a young man of eighteen? Even an exceptionally gifted man could not
play such a rôle before the age of thirty. And who would be capable, at thirty, of leading an army? If he were forty, he would still have things to learn. I should be surprised to learn that the King of Rumania was devoting as much as two hours a day to his studies. He ought to be working ten hours a day, on a very severe schedule. Monarchy is an out-of-date form. It has a raison d’être only where the monarch is the personification of the constitution, a symbol, and where the effective power is exercised by a Prime Minister or some other responsible chief. The last support of an inadequate monarch is the Army.
With a monarchy, therefore, there is always a danger that the Army may be able to imperil the country’s interests. ” Pagina 121
” To troops, the Spaniards are a crew of ragamuffins. They regard a rifle as an instrument that should not be cleaned under any pretext. Their sentries exist only in principle. They don’t take up their posts, or, if they do take them up, they do so in their sleep. When the Russians arrive, the natives have to wake them up. But the Spaniards have never yielded an inch of ground. One can’t imagine more fearless fellows. They scarcely take cover. They flout death. I know, in any case, that our men are always glad to have Spaniards as neighbours in their sector. If one reads the writings of Goeben on the Spaniards, one realises that nothing has changed in a hundred years. Extraordinarily brave, tough against privations, but wildly undisciplined. What is lamentable with them is the difference in treatment between officers and men. The Spanish officers live in clover, and the men are reduced to the most meagre pittance. The Hungarians are good auxiliaries for us. With proper stiffening, we find them very useful. As for Rumania, she has only one man, Antonescu ! ” Pagina 179
” Unless Antonescu gains the ear of the people, he’s undone. The commander who has no troops behind him cannot maintain himself for long. It’s thanks to the People’s Party that Ataturk assured his rule. It’s the same thing in Italy. If
Antonescu were to disappear to-day, there would be a terrible struggle in the Army between the claimants to his succession. That wouldn’t happen if there were an organisation that could impose his successor. In his place, I’d have made the Legion the basis of power, after first shooting Horia Sima. Without a solid political basis, it’s not possible either to settle a question of succession or to guarantee the normal administration of the State. From this point of view, the Rumanians are in a state of inferiority in relation to the Hungarians. The
Hungarian State has the advantages of a parliament. For us, such a thing would be intolerable; but theirs is one whose executive power is, in practice, independent.” Pagina 223
” If something happened to Antonescu, I’d tremble for Rumania. Who’d succeed him? King Michael. He didn’t even help his mother to get down from her carriage! Did he think it would injure his royal dignity? I saw he was choked
with rage when he noticed I’d put his mother on my right, the place due to the king. I know very well it wasn’t according to protocol—but one can’t go on maintaining these obsolete customs. The Rumanian peasantry are merely wretched cattle. As for the ruling class, it’s rotten to the marrow. In the film Stadt Anatol, those Balkan regions, turned upside down by black gold, are admirably rendered. These people for whom chance has suddenly put a petroleum well under their feet, and who all at once become fabulously rich, it’s contrary to the whole natural order ! A town like Bucharest grows only as a result of speculation.” Pagina 337
” The Hungarians are better governed than the Rumanians. What a pity they can’t instal Croats instead of Rumanians! The Hungarians are wildly nationalist. They assimilate the Germans at extraordinary speed, and they know how to select the best of them for posts of command. We shan’t succeed in preserving the German minorities in Hungary except by taking over control of the State—or else we shall have to withdraw our minorities from Hungary.
Apart from those in Transylvania, the German minorities in Hungary have a tendency to degenerate. I realised this at Nuremberg, when I saw their delegations march past. In our plans for colonisation in Russia, we’ll find room for these minorities. It’s not profitable for us to repatriate minorities, but if I settle them on territories that don’t cost me anything, that’s quite different. A government must have a lot of authority to succeed in such an operation. Anyway, I suppose that if we want to practise a sincere friendship with Hungary, we shall have to withdraw our minorities from the country. Obviously, if we want to convert the Danube into a German river, our policy will have to be different. In that case, we’d have to settle all our minorities from the Balkans on the banks of the river. But we would be obliged to give the Germans of the Banat, for example, a land as fertile as the Banat. It’s clear that the Hungarians and Rumanians will never be reconciled, even if they regard Germany as a common enemy. If I settle the fifteen hundred thousand Germans of our
minorities in the Eastern territories, I’ll build an autobahn fifteen hundred kilometres long, dotted at intervals of fifty to a hundred kilometres with German agglomerations, including some important towns. That’s a tentative solution, but the Danube remains the Danube. We should establish a strong foothold at the Iron Gates. Unfortunately it’s an unprepossessing region and won’t attract our colonists. It will always be possible to populate the region by the exploitation of the copper-mines. That will be an excellent way of procuring the copper we need, and there will be all the more reason for it if we’re not on good terms with the Yugoslavs. The Danube is also the link with Turkey. And it’s only when one’s lines of communication are safe that one can build a world empire.” Pagina 338
” A youth of eighteen cannot take a decision that requires deep reflection—that’s difficult enough for a man who has reached full maturity! It’s enough to imagine where King Michael of Rumania would be without the support of a man as remarkable as Field-Marsh.al Antonescu. As it happens, the young man is stupid. Moreover, he has been rotted by his spoilt child’s upbringing, his father having entrusted him entirely to women during the most important period of his development. To sense the tragic nature of this abyss, it’s enough to compare the development of any man who’s ambitious to do something in life, with that of a prince by inheritance.” Pagina 387
Oare de ce Hitler avea o părere atât de rea despre Horia Sima, încât sugera să fie împușcat?
Nemtii se desteapta!; se trezec!; dar oare cu adevarat!?
Mare manifestatie mare! La Berlin? NUUUUUUUUU! La Frankfurt? NUUUUUUUUUU! Dar unde? Eh! unde? la Dresda! Ia sa vedem noi ce-au facut „dragii de americani” – iubiti nevoie mare de confratii nostri!; dar fara sa le fi explicat cineva cine sunt „americanii” de azi! – si aliatii! Traduc pe scurt un text istoric de pe internet (partial):
„Bombardarea orasului Dresden/ Dresda (capitala Saxoniei) a fost un bombardament aerian executat de aliati, ce a avut loc intre 13 si 15 februarie 1945; deci trei luni inainte de capitularea Germaniei! (fara nici un scop militar, ci numai de distrugere si de CRIMA impotriva umanitatii! asta cred eu!)
722 de avioane grele de bombardament ale Angliei si 527 ale USA au aruncat deasupra orasului 3.900 de TONE de bombe si dispozitive de incendiere a orasului! 6,5 [km2] din oras – centru – au fost rasi de pe fata pamintului! Intre 22.700,…,25.000 de civili au fost omoriti! Probabil n-a fost suficient!; deoarece alte trei raiduri au avut loc apoi pe 2 martie si 17 aprilie (pe 8 mai 1945, amiralul Donitz avea sa semneze capitulare neconditionata!!!!)”
Ei bine, nemtii si-au adus aminte de americani si cine sta de fapt in spatele „imigratiei” din tarile arabe si nord africane si au inceput protestul la! la! la Dresda:
Iata ce vor ei:
Putin la Berlin, Merkel in Siberia!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3rFhmstW5c
Oare NU ar fi momentul sa formam EuroAsia cu Rusia si sa scapam de „democratia sionista” americana?
Se poate domnu’ dec?
Parca e prea noapte si nu se distinge nicun chip uman iar coloana sonora pare ca e „crosetata” peste imaginea nerelevanta …
Se poate domnu’ Popescu Cristian ?
Si aici este ”crosetat” sonorul peste imagine ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=1&v=9UNZO5fokeE
…nu cred ca e vreun site in tara si in UE fara sa fie urmarit de noul „secu albastru”!
Sunt convins ca nici nu-l cheama „Popescu Cristian”!; si mai sunt convins ca a ales aceasta „meserie” ca nu e bun de nimic altceva! Deh! bugetar, coada de topor!
Stimate domnule dec!
Blogul domnului profesor Ion Coja nu este loc de dispute personale ci un loc de dezbateri politice, istorice, filozofice etc …!
Eu mi-am permis sa fac o apreciere asupra unui clip care se vrea manipulator, a si reusit in mare parte …!
Prin intermediul domnului profesor va invit la o bere sa ne prezentam datele de identificare, fac eu cinste …!
Ar fi o singura problema, CINE E „DEC”?
…ma tem ca „discutia” ar fi prea scurta pentru bautul unei beri…
Dec e doar un rusofill pontac … si ca el o gramada de rusofili . Sau mafioti ? Ca asta a devenit rusia .. o mare mafie unde coruptia e de 10 ori mai mare ca la noi. Unde ziaristi si judecatori sunt redusi la tacere prin crima. Dar apar indivizi ca dec vorbind de cat de iubitoare e rusia , rusie care de fapt e inamicul romaniei de cand lumea …
‘Langsam langsam aber sicher'(‘Incet incet dar sigur’) se trezesc nemtii din somn, si cu ei si restul popoarelor asuprite!
Domnu’ Popescu Cristian, ne puteti spune cum au fost trucate aceste imagini ?
https://deepresource.wordpress.com/2015/09/20/meanwhile-in-germany/
Cu tot respectul pe care vi-l port …sunt doua subiecte total diferite ….!!!
Asa deci, mitingul are loc pe’nserate, filmarea e de la distanta iar sunetul este „crosetat” …
Pe de alta parte, este adevarat ca opozitia fata de Merkel creste in Germania, motivat si indubitabil, dar imaginile care fac obiectul discutiei nu pot fi luate in seama …
In rest, stimati dec si Adi Aro, tin sa va multumesc pentru informatiile postate pe acest blog …
….aiuritor „comentariul” tau…
Pai nu te retine nimeni sa emigrezi la rusi .. Incearca si coreea de nord … posibil sa iti placa si mai mult. Desi la cum scrii se pare ca esti in hotelul ala de pontaci a lui putin .. Cu dresda a fost ce a fost clar tot nu vom stii cum au stat lucrurile.Daca erai mai inteligent intrebai de ce a existat nagasaki .. 9 august ’45 Dar dupa razboi tinand cont de ce mizerie au facut rusii in RDG si de cum arata RFG unde erau americanii blamati de tine … Diferentele dintre cele doua tari (atunci) spune tot. RUsii au fost si sunt si probabil mereu vor fi inamicii romaniei. Asa ca degeaba te agiti cu putinisme .. du-te tu la rusi.
…nu sunt asa de inteligent ca tine; iar dumneata mai crezi in cai verzi pe pereti cel putin in ceea ce priveste USA. Parol!
NIci nu am pretentii de inteligenta din partea rusofililor .. ar fi contradictie in termeni … totusi.
Coșmarul american, și ceea ce se ostenesc din răsputeri să împiedice – o alianță Rusia-Germania, care ar atrage toate țările Europei în siajul
său… Ar însemna sfârșitul hegemoniei yankee în Europa.