http://germarrudolf.com/#ftnref1
 
Germar’s Views
I figure you did not come here to read about my opinions on Global Warming, Hinduism, Jenghiz Khan, or any other real or imagined topic. No, if somebody looks up Germar Rudolf, he probably wants to learn about his views on the „Holocaust” and anything connected with it. Of course I have opinions on many other topics as well, but those will not be the focus of this section of my website. You might find some stray topics covered here as well, though, as I’ve sometimes also written about other issues.
The various papers in this section are organized hierarchically and numbered in a style as is typical for U.S. universities: It starts with a first series a „light” reading bearing 100-numbers, then gets tougher to the 200-numbers, and so on.
If you want to read more, feel free to browse the various pages listed under this entry of my Navigation menu – or as excerpted below.
This is an extremely brief list of false claims about Holocaust revisionism – and an even shorter list of correct statements.
 
This paper presents the essence of what Holocaust revisionism is all about, condensed to fit onto a legal size flyer. It gives a quick overview for those who want to spend only a few minutes in order to get an idea about this controversial topic.
Since when do we know that Six Million Jews died during the Holocaust? Most people think that this was established after the War when the Allies investigated the alleged Nazi crimes during a series of court proceedings. But in his book The First Holocaust, Don Heddesheimer shows that the number can be traced back to newspaper sources going as far back as from before the First World War. This paper is a preface which I wrote for this book back in 2003.
 
This text expands the issue of 102 to fill 10 pages in a letter-size brochure. It is a list of frequently asked questions about revisionism with appropriate answers to them. Some of the questions answered are, for instance: What is Revisionism? Why is historical Revisionism important? What does Holocaust Revisionism claim? What about those pictures of mountains of dead bodies in the concentration camps? Does it really matter whether prisoners died from disease or poison gas? Does it matter how many Jews were killed during the Third Reich since even one thousand would have been too many? Whatever the circumstances, don’t Jewish victims deserve respect and compensation? What do Holocaust Revisionists want? Learn the answers to these and other questions right here…
 
This is a 47 letter-size pages essay about the state of the art of revisionist Holocaust research, its impact, trials and tribulations as perceived in 2003. It introduces and at once summarizes all the articles included in the revisionist anthology Dissecting the Holocaust. This paper gives a pretty comprehensive overview of the revisionist outlook on the „Holocaust” and needless to say in particular about my own views, which haven’t changed much since then. So by reading this you can both learn about the Holocaust, about revisionism, and about Yours Truly.
 
Zyklon B, gypsum granules soaked with highly toxic liquid hydrogen cyanide (HCN), is said to have been used in homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz to kill about one million inmates, mainly Jews. If HCN encounters rust (iron oxide), they both react and form a very stable blue pigment, which can be analytically detected for decades, if not centuries. This formation of a blue pigment occurred in the walls of a number of Zyklon B delousing chambers, were the Nazis are said to have killed only lice. Analyses of sample taken from alleged homicidal gas chambers, however, show no such residues. So what does that mean? Read on…
 
Both numerous former concentration camp inmates as well as many camp guards have testified in unison what the evil Nazis did in their camp system to millions of victims. So how could anyone doubt that what they say is true? Before criticizing what these witnesses say (which, btw, is discordant in many ways), one should first look into the value of these statements. This paper investigates the circumstances under which the various testimonies were made, and based on this tries to evaluate the trustworthiness of those statements, irrespective of their contents.
 
Six Million Jews fell victim to the Holocaust. So we are told. The only mainstream book dealing with this issue, published in 1991, does indeed confirm this number. But a revisionist book from 1983 contests that figure, claiming a victim count of „merely” 300,000. Both are based on solid statistical material. So how come the results are so different? This paper of mine points out how their numbers differ, why that is so, and what conclusions are to be drawn from this.
 
I consider the 500 pages Lectures my main work. They strive to give a comprehensive overview of revisionist research results on a broad variety of topics within the historical events described as „the Holocaust.” With the help of a number of other revisionist researchers, I try to keep the book up to date by having new editions published every now and so often. So if you want to keep abreast of the state of the art in independent Holocaust research without having to read numerous special studies and research papers, this is the book to read.
 
In 1988, Fred Leuchter, American expert for execution technologies, investigated the alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz and Majdanek and concluded that they could not have functioned as claimed. In 1993, Yours Truly, back then a PhD researcher at the Max Planck Institute in Stuttgart, published a thorough forensic study about the „gas chambers” of Auschwitz. In it I tried to iron out the deficiencies Leuchter’s work. This new 2011 edition analyzes a plethora of evidence on the Auschwitz gas chambers and discusses objection made against earlier editions. The appendix describes me subsequent persecution…
 
Once I had been labeled a „Holocaust Denier,” I was fair game for the liars and obfuscators. Whereas they get all the mainstream support and media attention needed to spread their lies and distortions about me and my research, my corrections and rebuttals remain unheard. They are simply censored by silence. So what is a right to speak out worth, if there is no right to be heard? This book is a collection of papers refuting false claims about my work, and it exposes the flawed arguments of those who tried to refute my research.
 
In 1988, Fred A. Leuchter, the American expert for execution technologies, investigated the facilities in the Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek camps claimed to have served as chemical slaughterhouses for hundreds of thousands of victims — also called „gas chambers.” Leuchter changed the course of history when he concluded in his report that the locations investigated „could not have then been, or now, be utilized or seriously considered to function as execution gas chambers.” This edition publishes all of Leuchter’s four report and subjects the first of them, which has caused a huge controversy and triggered a landslide of new research, to a thorough critique, backing up Leuchter’s claims with more information and references, where he is right, and correcting him, where he erred.
 
This is the ultimate collection of revisionist knowledge on the Holocaust in the English language, comprising 24 volumes so far and counting.
 
This is an (almost) complete list of all the published writings of mine published since I got involved into revisionism, except for those posted on the blog posts and pages of this website. Also included are books I edited or published during my years as an editor and publisher, plus the websites I used to master. As you will see, these writings run the entire gamut of revisionist publications.
 NOTA REDACȚIEI
Am pornit, în urmă cu vreo 20 de ani, de la convingerea că ne aflăm în legitimă apărare. Suntem acuzați, noi, românii, că Ion Antonescu și Armata Română au savârșit un genocid de mari proporții, cu sute de mii de victime nevinovate. Încă de la început am avertizat că aceste acuzații sunt o dovadă de imprudență iresponsabilă: Nouă, românilor, ne este ușor să respingem asemenea acuzații care nu se bazează pe niciun document! Pe nicio probă juridic valabilă! Iar respingerea acestor acuzații va fi, fără voia noastră, de mare folos celor care neagă Holocaustul în întregimea sa! Repet: respingerea acuzației de holocaust în România va conveni de minune celor care neagă în general Holocaustul!
    Am afirmat de mai multe ori: Eu nu neg Holocaustul, eu neg Holocaustul din România. Și asta pentru că nu cunosc decât acest subiect: situația din România… Pentru ce a fost în Polonia sau Germania ori Ungaria nu am suficient de multe date ca să mă pronunț, și nici nu mă bag să rezolv eu problemele altora!
    Iată însă că, de câțiva ani buni, s-au înmulțit autorii și lucrările, din ce în ce mai serioase, mai convingătoare, care contestă Holocaustul, în general. În timp ce, printre autorii holocaustizanți, nu a mai apărut niciun nume nou, unii chiar au făcut pasul înapoi și au recunoscut, de exemplu, că nu găsim nicio dovadă pentru existența camerelor de gazare… Inclusiv câțiva autori evrei se îndoiesc de dimensiunile de holocaust ale Holocaustului!
    Vocea holocaustizanților se aude tot mai slab, mai anemic! Asta pe plan internațional! Căci pe plan național, la noi, în fascinanta România, aceste voci sunt tot mai sonore, mai asurzitoare, mai sâcâitoare… Dacă lucrurile vor evolua mai departe pe acest „trend”, curând se va spune că Holocaustul de la Auschwitz sau Dakau n-a prea fost holocaust, și că singurul loc în care putem fi siguri de un Holocaust incontestabil este Transnistria, adică România.
Aș putea pune chiar un rămășag cu această miză! Și asta pentru că numai la noi s-au făcut holocaustologi peste noapte niște neica nimeni, ca să nu zic mai rău! Niște mercenari, niște mincinoși cu ora, care nu vor conteni decât odată cu sinecura pe care încă o mai primesc! Să le fie de cap!
                                                                Ion  Coja