Ordinul de efectuare a holocaustului a fost transmis de Hitler prin telepatie. De aceea nu există dovezi…

Stiti ce inseamna de fapt bataia de joc fata de ‘antisemitismul „stiintific” ‘ folosit aici referitor la rigoarea mult seriosului cercetator stiintific , profesorul universitar Ion Coja , care nu lucreaza decat pe baza de dovezi clare care impun o logica extrem de riguroasa fara dubii asupra adevarului ?

Inseamna atitudinea generala in procesele intentate revizionistilor : NU SE ACCEPTA DOVEZI STIINTIFICE !

Asa se face ca, de catre comunitaristii in vesnice procese si vanatori de istorici revizionisti, din Apus, socotitul mare si supremul expert al holocaustului, Raoul Hilberg, in exemplul dat de sorbonnardul Robert Faurisson, Hilberg , care respingea in discutii orice dovezi stiintifice – DA, STIINTIFICE ‘!, i-a dat lui Faurisson un raspuns stupefiant care demonstreaza exact logica pe baza careia, anumite comunitati si organizatii comunitariste evreiesti, baga la inchisoare istoricii haituiti de ei prin tribunale – zice Raoul Hilberg:

„But what began in 1941 was a process of destruction not planned in advance, not organized centrally by any agency. There was no blueprint and there was no budget for destructive measures. They [these measures] were taken step by step, one step at a time. Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus — mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy.

Let us note again those final words: „an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus — mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy.” Note 5″

Titlul
“Genocide By Telepathy, Hilberg Explains”
By Robert Faurisson
Link:
https://www.ihr.org/jhr/v18/v18n1p15_Faurisson.html

Deci conform lui Hilberg, acolo unde Faurisson a cerut acte asupra planificarii genocidului sau dovezi asupra camerelor de gazare iar Hilberg nu le-a gasit, conform lui Hilberg ,genocidul a avut totusi loc caci a fost planificat prin telepatie – „an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus — mind reading by a far-flung bureaucracy.” Note 5(According to The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, „mind reading” is defined as „The faculty of discerning another’s thoughts through extrasensory means of communication; telepathy.”), cum explica textul citat de mai sus

DECI ACESTE ORGANIZATII CARE HAITUIESC ISTORICII SETOSI DE ADEVAR SI NU DE VORBE GOALE, ACOLO UNDE NU GASESC ARGUMENTE STIINTIFICE – ITI OFERA TELEPATIA .
E NORMAL CA ANUMITE ORGANIZATII FASCISTOIDE SA NU ACCEPTE STIINTA IN TRIBUNALE, SI SA-SI BATA JOC DE RIGORILE ADEVARULUI BAZAT PE DOVEZI STIINTIFICE , CARE RAMAN ASTFEL INTERZISE IN FATA JUDECATII , DEVENITE AUTOMAT NEDREPTE .