„Garda de Fier, cel mai bun lucru pe care l-a dat secolul nostru”! Aceasta era părerea lui Goebbels despre Mişcarea legionară…
Contains Link

jos marxismul4 hours ago
.
cum se face că în contradicţie cu toţi aliaţii săi, în contradicţie cu
colaboratorii săi şi cu toată armata care îl asculta atât de orbeşte,
Hitler i-a duşmănit aşa de tare pe legionari?…
Nu mă întreb de ce i-a urît Hitler pe legionari, ci mă întreb de partea
cui era Hitler, devreme ce i-a urît aşa de tare pe legionari?!
plecand de la zicala „cui ii esti dator iti este stapan” si analizand care au fost investitorii lui Hitler si conditiile pe care investitorii le pun cand intra intr-o afacere, e simplu de dedus ca Hitler administra afacerea nazista dupa programul facut de bancherii sionisti si anticrestini. Sunt aceiasi investitori care l-au adus la putere si pe Stalin. Niciodata un investitor destept nu ramane neasigurat impotriva riscurilor, nu conteaza ce parte castiga daca el e organizatorul jocului. Iar azi e mult mai usor decat atunci sa te asiguri, chiar pe bursa prin hedging, e chiar mai profitabil de finantat razboaie azi.
aici https://images-na.ssl-image… sau aici
https://www.omnia-veritas.c…
puteti gasi mai multe detalii. A doua carte fiind scrisa sub pseudonim de fiul bancherului Paul Warburg, fondator Federal Reserve si director CFR, cel care s-a ocupat de tranzactiile importante ale lui Hitler, pana a ajuns la putere. Autorul aminteste si o predica crestina tinuta soldatilor, in care dusmanul evreu era exemplificat de Stalin.
(preluat de pe dr.Henry Makow)

If a suppressed 75-page booklet, Hitler’s Secret Backers, (1933) is correct, the check was picked up by the Rothschilds. Their only stipulation was that Hitler adopt „an aggressive” foreign policy.

Specifically, WW2 killed roughly 50 million European Christians, wiping out the cream of another generation. It also provided a justification for the establishment of the State of Israel, world HQ of the satanist Illuminati.

HITLER’S BENEFACTORS

The Powers That Be dismiss this book as another anti-Semitic. However the book is not anti-Semitic. The Rothschilds are not mentioned once. The New York financiers –Rothschild frontmen–are depicted as non-Jews.

Sydney Warburg describes his first meeting in July 1929 with a „Carter” (John Ridgley Carter) the president of JP Morgan’s Guarantee Trust, „the young Rockefeller” (John Davison Rockefeller Junior) and „Glean from Royal Dutch” (i.e. Henri Deterding).

The book is critical of Hitler and the Nazis. „Sydney Warburg” describes Hitler in these terms. „…he is not intelligent but unusually self centred and tenacious.” Hitler’s long rants made it impossible to carry on a discourse, and he carelessly „babbles about his plans without the slightest hesitation.” (85)

There is no doubt in my mind that the Rothschilds were responsible for the holocaust.

Essentially, Hitler was false opposition. He was the arms-length creation of the central banking cartel he railed against. According to Warburg, Hitler „could tell he was dealing with someone who represented the strongest financial group in the world.” (85) He wondered out loud if the German-born Warburg was Jewish but was content, Warburg’s German name was enough.

Apparently, Hitler chose the democratic path to power because these sums were not enough to finance a coup d’etat. „Revolution costs 500 million marks,” Hitler told Warburg. „Legal takeover costs 200 million marks. What will your backers decide?” (57)

After the first transfer of money, the US Press suddenly took an interest in Hitler. Seemingly speaking with one voice, it described Hitler as „the saviour of Germany and a rising name in Europe”. (37)

At one point, Hitler tells Warburg that Western leaders are a bunch of old wives. He only respects Mussolini and Stalin: „Stalin is a Jew. That is a shame.” (53)

Warburg was in Berlin when the Reichstag burned. „If it is true that the Hitler Party had a hand in the burning, then Hitler is the best actor I have met in five continents.” (88)

AUTHENTICITY

Whenever the Elders of Zion are exposed, they proclaim the document a hoax. Indeed, there are some internal references that would throw the reader off James Warburg’s trail. For example, he says both he and his father were born in the USA, which is not true. These references were planted to allow Warburg to disavow the document if necessary.

A lot more points to his authorship. First, Warburg was a natural intermediary. Born in Germany, he spoke fluent German. He was only 33-years-old in 1929 but had been a bank Vice-President for eight years. He became an advisor to FDR but left government in 1934, which would coincide with his alienation from the bankers’ plot.

In Feb. 1950, Major Robert H. Williams reported: „Last November, the widow of the late General Erich Ludendorff, on trial at Nuremberg, explained why her husband broke with Hitler. She stated that, …as early as the summer of 1929 James Paul Warburg had undertaken an assignment from financial circles in America, which desired to exercise solitary influence on Germany in the unleashing of a national revolution. Warburg’s task was to find the suitable man in Germany, and he entered into contract with Adolph Hitler who subsequently received sums of money amounting to 27 million dollars up to January 30, 1932, and still another seven million thereafter, enabling him to finance his movement.”
On February 20,1933, referring to Warburg’s final visit, Goebbels confided in his diary:” We are raising a huge sum for the election (Reichstag election, March 5) that disposes of all our financial problems at one blow.” (97)
Finally, the booklet is replete with little details that reflect the attitude of a bewildered visitor. He relates a Christian sermon given to Nazi soldiers „The enemy that Christ wanted to conquer by his crucifixion aspires to rise ..in the Wandering Jew” … epitomized by Stalin. (64) He recalls a conversation with his uncle who admits he is a member of the Nazi Party despite being Jewish. (101) He describes Nazi „speaking choruses” – choirs that stand on street corners shouting Nazi slogans. In addition, Warburg relates the central role played by banker Eduard Von der Heydt, someone only an insider would know about. Von der Heydt’s eventual alienation from the Nazis is mentioned in the book. Warburg also knows how Morgan’s Guaranty Trust communicated in a code. Most likely Sidney Warburg is the young James Warburg who had, at that time, compunctions at empowering Hitler.

less